Thu Jun 28 10:59:13 2001 While I do believe that AIDS is a weapon being used by the Federal Fraud Machine (FFM) and its allies, I disagree that it is a contagious disease caused by a little retrovirus, many types which exist in the normal human system. There are hundreds of well known doctors, microbiologists, professors, laymen who have proved that AIDS is not caused by HIV but by drugs end/or other immuno suppresive factors. AIDS is really a psyop weapon that actually gets “the AIDS victim” to kill him or herself. Rather than go into a lengthy and detailed explanation, I suggest you visit http://www.duesberg.com or aidsmyth.com or virusmyth.com. The AIDS dissidents like Dr. Duesberg, Professor of Microbiology at UC, Kerry Mullis, Noble Prize winner for the PCP test, Walter Gilbert of Harvard, Dr. Charlie Thomas formally at John Hopkins and Harvard, and many others get almost no publicity for their views. Dr. Duesberg has paid for his views by losing a $3 million research contract plus almost all of his other non professor revenues. As he told me “If I would come out and say that maybe HIV is partially responsible for AIDS, I could be paid like an NBA star, like Gallo (who stole the HIV virus from Montagnier) is currently. Now I’ll just have to get by on my tenured professor salary.” Most of the biological research at Fort Detrick has been bogus and led nowhere. Yet, a lot of people and companies continue to get rich with such research.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970
United States Senate Library
HEARINGS before a SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Subcommittee on Department of Defense
George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman
Robert L.F. Sikes, Florida, Glenard P. Lipscomb, California
Jamie D. Whitten, Mississippi William E. Minshall, Ohio
George W. Andrews, Alabama, John J. Rhodes, Arizona
Daniel J. Flood, Pennsylvania Glenn R. Davis, Wisconsin
John M. Slack, West Virginia, Joseph P. Addabbo, New York
Frank E. Evans, Colorado
Temporarily assigned H.B. 15090
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Department of the Army
Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency
Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering
Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1969
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY
TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.
MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?
DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.
MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.
MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be. The time and the cost involved?
DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. The information follows:
The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:
1. All biological agents up the the present time are representitives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.
2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.
4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.
It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.
Population And The American Future
The Report Of The Commission On Population Growth And The American Future
John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Chairman
March 27, 1972
“Letter of Transmittal”
Commission on Population Growth and the American Future
726 Jackson Place, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20506
March 27, 1972
To the President and Congress of the United States:
I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.
After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.
The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and please=”” acknowledge=”” and=”” use=”” a=”” link=”” to=”” website<=”” hide=””>consequences of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.
To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.
Respectfully submitted for the Commission,
John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Chairman
The President of the Senate
The Speaker of the House of Representatives
John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Executive Director, Food for All, Inc.
Christian N. Ramsey, Jr., M.D.
President, The Institute for the Study of Health and Society
Joseph D. Beasley, M.D.
The Edward Wisner Professor of Public Health
Tulane University Medical Center
David E. Bell
Executive Vice President, The Ford Foundation
President, The Population Council
Arnita Young Boswell
Associate Field Work Professor
School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago
Professor, Dept. of Behavioral Sciences and Dept. of Epidemiology
School of Hygiene and Public Health
The Johns Hopkins University
Marilyn Brant Chandler
Housewife, Volunteer, Student
Paul B. Cornely, M.D.
Professor, Dept. of Community Health Practice, College of Medicine
Assistant to the Executive Medical Officer
Welfare and Retirement Fund United Mine Workers of America
United States Senator
Lawrence A. Davis
by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.
It is hard to believe the public law that authorized AIDS will be thirty one years old next week. Even more remarkable, that in a score and a half, no one has ever read it!
aids the virus official u s house weapon war 10 i do believe being federal its it disease caused little many which exist normal human there known doctors have hiv but end other kill rather than into duesberg like dr professor test harvard thomas john hopkins others get almost no their views paid his 3 million research as he if would come out could star now just most biological fort detrick led yet people such department of defense appropriations 1970 united states senate library before subcommittee committee on representatives congress first george h chairman robert sikes p california d e w j rhodes daniel davis m joseph new frank b 5 and statement director printed use government washington 1969 1 synthetic agents two agent field one technological molecular biology very within years possible does naturally mr any work macarthur we why lack interest information program time cost happy progress made science a experts considered following all up present thus scientists throughout world they available defensive 2 next make important these processes depend 4 highly university however initiate adequate through national sciences council cb controversial issue should lead scientific knowledge done devise enemy military population american future report commission growth rockefeller 3rd march 27 1972 n c to president consideration findings recommendations after long result further nation ability problems health country nor welfare public please consequences vice executive christian medical david ford school social dept paul college medicine america lawrence & nixon pl91213 boyd graves law authorized even more events politics richard policy africa history flow chart did special see effectively ethnic until november 70 since in current dollar give back humans god 1971 visna never secret german state under black so resources won t anything going yeah though white need only wasting eugenics kennedy true call review reviewing truth assemblies billy joe daugherty bishop charles blake green church cogic ministries depopulation freemason grant jefferies illuminati jack jane hanson aglow international hagee zionism kenneth copeland roberts jakes van impe hagin pope lahaye word russell bean lukens bullinger munroe worship woodrow reyes murdock lighthouse knight ice
Filed under: AIDS, Cecil Rhodes, Depopulation, EUGENICS, John D. Rockefeller | Tagged: AIDS/HIV, Assemblies of God, Billy Joe Daugherty, Bishop Charles Blake, Bishop Charles Green, Bishop Neil Ellis, British Israel, Cecil Rhodes, Church of God In Christ, COGIC, Creflo Dollar Ministries, Dave Hunt, Depopulation, Dr. Boyd Graves, EUGENICS, Freemason, Grant Jefferies, Illuminati, Jack Hayford, Jane Hanson - Aglow International, John D. Rockefeller, John Hagee Ministries, john hagee zionism, Juanita Bynum, Kenneth Copeland, kenneth-copleland, Oral Roberts, PL91-213, Rothschild, T. Lahaye, T.D. Jakes |